Is it the second coming of Donald Trump?
Some evangelicals think he’s anointed by God.
Then there is another meaning of the word come, or do I mean cum as in the stormy waters of Stormy Daniels?
How many evangelicals will stay on that ship or will they fall off to the ocean of soul searching?
Some hang on tight because of traditional marriage and commitment to money and power.
Glad I can still write this in USA, but who knows what the future could bring.
I couldn’t write stuff like this in the Christian nation of Russia, now at war with it’s former colony Ukraine.
I couldn’t write this in Afghanistan or Iran, noted for their hatred of “difference” and their war on women.
Friday, January 24, 2025
Cartoon of my fears.
Personal to the left on the chart.
Communal, about the state of the country and the world, to the right on the chart.
Poem by me. Immigration.
Is it too many families, children and individual adults flooding our borders looking for safety from trouble overseas? Overpopulation?
Is it too much foreign money, flooding into our country and using it as a safe haven for money inflating property prices so Americans can no longer afford to live in our own country?
Vancouver, BC, in Canada has something called an empty condos tax. Discouraging foreign investors from buying condos to keep locked and empty as better investments than low interest at the bank.
Is it too much money, seeking our safe haven, making our dollar too strong so our products cost too much for the products to immigrate to cheaper countries?
Maybe we can solve this problem by crashing our own dollar, then we can export our products. We can be like a third world country and let the foreigners drill, baby drill our natural resources for export markets.
Yes, maybe not a bad idea, as our natural gas can help Europe get by until it reaches the utopia of green energy. This because the so called good Christians, in Russia, are being boycotted by Europe after Russia invades it’s former colony; Ukraine.
Is it too much foreign money, flooding into our country and using it as a safe haven for money inflating property prices so Americans can no longer afford to live in our own country?
Vancouver, BC, in Canada has something called an empty condos tax. Discouraging foreign investors from buying condos to keep locked and empty as better investments than low interest at the bank.
Is it too much money, seeking our safe haven, making our dollar too strong so our products cost too much for the products to immigrate to cheaper countries?
Maybe we can solve this problem by crashing our own dollar, then we can export our products. We can be like a third world country and let the foreigners drill, baby drill our natural resources for export markets.
Yes, maybe not a bad idea, as our natural gas can help Europe get by until it reaches the utopia of green energy. This because the so called good Christians, in Russia, are being boycotted by Europe after Russia invades it’s former colony; Ukraine.
Thursday, January 23, 2025
New attorney general, in my home state of Washington, plays a role in the news about birthright citizenship today. Sometimes known, by rightwingers, as the anchor baby topic.
President Trump issued an executive order that attempted to end automatic citizenship to babies born in USA, whether the parents are US citizens or not.
This could be called the "anchor baby" issue as many of Trump's right wing supporters seem to be tired of all the anchor babies born in USA. Over population? But many of these Trump supporters call themselves pro birth.
Anchor baby is kind of a derogatory term used to describe the situation of having a child in the US; like placing an anchor toward better life in America.
Birthright citizenship is in the constitution so Trump's executive order is on shaky grounds. A Federal Judge ruled, today, to suspend that order for the next 14 days while there are more briefings in the legal challenge.
Our new attorney general, here in the state of Washington, played an important role in that case now making national news.
One of my friends has a situation not often heard, related to this issue. He was born, in USA, to Latin American parents. A child born to a a family drawn to USA for a professional job. Being of US citizenship and growing up here, he was very American.
Later in life, he moved to the Latin American country where his parents lived because he was having trouble finding professional level work, in this part of USA.
Maybe he could have stayed here if he had aspired to be a janitor with interesting hobbies, like me.
This friend has a BA degree from college in the humanities and has career interest in film production and teaching.
Try getting a job at a university, or some other institutions in USA, without more credentials.
No PHD? Little work experience in the field? A catch 22. No Ivy League degree? No way.
Back in his parents home country, a college education is worth more than a dime a dozen. He moved to a Latin American country and to a world less flooded with over qualified humanities graduates. His professional career took off; teaching, writing and so forth.
He still misses many things about life in USA, but moving overseas was a good career move, in his case.
Often it does seem like, in USA, there's no room at the inn.
This could be called the "anchor baby" issue as many of Trump's right wing supporters seem to be tired of all the anchor babies born in USA. Over population? But many of these Trump supporters call themselves pro birth.
Anchor baby is kind of a derogatory term used to describe the situation of having a child in the US; like placing an anchor toward better life in America.
Birthright citizenship is in the constitution so Trump's executive order is on shaky grounds. A Federal Judge ruled, today, to suspend that order for the next 14 days while there are more briefings in the legal challenge.
Our new attorney general, here in the state of Washington, played an important role in that case now making national news.
One of my friends has a situation not often heard, related to this issue. He was born, in USA, to Latin American parents. A child born to a a family drawn to USA for a professional job. Being of US citizenship and growing up here, he was very American.
Later in life, he moved to the Latin American country where his parents lived because he was having trouble finding professional level work, in this part of USA.
Maybe he could have stayed here if he had aspired to be a janitor with interesting hobbies, like me.
This friend has a BA degree from college in the humanities and has career interest in film production and teaching.
Try getting a job at a university, or some other institutions in USA, without more credentials.
No PHD? Little work experience in the field? A catch 22. No Ivy League degree? No way.
Back in his parents home country, a college education is worth more than a dime a dozen. He moved to a Latin American country and to a world less flooded with over qualified humanities graduates. His professional career took off; teaching, writing and so forth.
He still misses many things about life in USA, but moving overseas was a good career move, in his case.
Often it does seem like, in USA, there's no room at the inn.
Wednesday, January 22, 2025
About getting the momentum started on a new social networking platform.
I think the Blue Sky platform will have better luck competing with Facebook than attempts to compete with Facebook in the past. Granted, it's not quite the same, it's more like Twitter (now X).
In the past some attempts to compete with Facebook couldn't get the momentum going due to platforms playing lip service to privacy.
Privacy is kind of the antithesis of social networking. If folks are on a new network, privacy will mean little content can be seen until one builds up a network of friends. Getting this momentum started can be difficult.
Facebook got going early so the friend networks are established. Other platforms have trouble breaking that momentum unless they are more like the open web where content can be searched in Google and so forth.
Where content can be found without having to be friended in friend networks. In a more open environment, friend networks can still develop over time.
I think the wish for privacy may have made Ello, an alternative social network launched in 2014 never really got off the ground. It closed in 2023.
Content on Blue Sky seems to be more available to newcomers who haven't yet established friend networks there. Reddit is similar in being more open as are platforms like Flickr.
In the past some attempts to compete with Facebook couldn't get the momentum going due to platforms playing lip service to privacy.
Privacy is kind of the antithesis of social networking. If folks are on a new network, privacy will mean little content can be seen until one builds up a network of friends. Getting this momentum started can be difficult.
Facebook got going early so the friend networks are established. Other platforms have trouble breaking that momentum unless they are more like the open web where content can be searched in Google and so forth.
Where content can be found without having to be friended in friend networks. In a more open environment, friend networks can still develop over time.
I think the wish for privacy may have made Ello, an alternative social network launched in 2014 never really got off the ground. It closed in 2023.
Content on Blue Sky seems to be more available to newcomers who haven't yet established friend networks there. Reddit is similar in being more open as are platforms like Flickr.
When do we call USA an oligarchy instead of a democracy?
There is a shade of gray between oligarchy and democracy. Where the line is drawn depends on who one is talking to.
According to some folks on the left, we've already been an oligarchy for a long time. A nation run by the rich and the corporations. Little or no difference between the major political parties; the Democrats behold-ant to corporate power as much as the Republicans. Some might say it's been there all along so it's nothing new.
Others, like me, would say it has been more of a democracy during my lifetime. I tend to believe the people, in mass, determine the outcomes. Personal behavior in the marketplace, voting booth and so forth.
It's been most likely a product of both undue influence from the wealthy and "the people have spoken." Of course not all people think the same, but the summation of all creates the culture.
The future is undecided. Will future historians point to January 20 2025 as the date democracy turned to oligarchy? That's the date of the second inauguration of Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Ops, I mean Trump and JD Vance; Freudian slip.
The pendulum could swing back the other way in the future. Who knows what the future will bring.
Another question is, if folks believe we have been in an oligarchy, has that been a self fulfilling prophecy? Only time will tell.
According to some folks on the left, we've already been an oligarchy for a long time. A nation run by the rich and the corporations. Little or no difference between the major political parties; the Democrats behold-ant to corporate power as much as the Republicans. Some might say it's been there all along so it's nothing new.
Others, like me, would say it has been more of a democracy during my lifetime. I tend to believe the people, in mass, determine the outcomes. Personal behavior in the marketplace, voting booth and so forth.
It's been most likely a product of both undue influence from the wealthy and "the people have spoken." Of course not all people think the same, but the summation of all creates the culture.
The future is undecided. Will future historians point to January 20 2025 as the date democracy turned to oligarchy? That's the date of the second inauguration of Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Ops, I mean Trump and JD Vance; Freudian slip.
The pendulum could swing back the other way in the future. Who knows what the future will bring.
Another question is, if folks believe we have been in an oligarchy, has that been a self fulfilling prophecy? Only time will tell.
Standardized modular housing construction. A way to reduce insurance costs.
The standard American home and nature often don't mix; especially in urban / rural fringe areas such as where many of the recent Los Angeles Fires occurred. Future insurance policies could be written to only replace the building with a basic minimum dwelling, such as like a FEMA trailer. For households of more people, maybe several of these units could be installed together for more space.
This type of policy would likely be more affordable than one that tries to rebuild what was on the lot before.
This type of policy would likely be more affordable than one that tries to rebuild what was on the lot before.
Tuesday, January 21, 2025
Insurance and or government should just pay for FEMA type trailers to rebuild, after LA fires and call it good.
My quirky idea for rebuilding homes that have burned due to the recent LA wildfires. This idea also addresses the lack of coverage / insurance crisis as well as the government funding burden.
Provide cheap modular structures; like FEMA Trailers, so people have a place to live and call it good.
If folks wish to rebuild something larger, or different, they can pay for it out of their own pockets; if their private insurance coverage doesn't cover rebuilding the home.
This solution can work for all people living in high risk areas; such as floodplains or the coast of Florida.
If folks wish to rebuild something larger, or different, they can pay for it out of their own pockets; if their private insurance coverage doesn't cover rebuilding the home.
This solution can work for all people living in high risk areas; such as floodplains or the coast of Florida.
Monday, January 20, 2025
Can USA get along with tarriffs on Canadian fossil fuels?
A recent speech by Trump said, we don't need Canadian energy, "we can produce our own."
I realize that northern parts of USA get much of our natural gas, for heating, from Canada. How fast can we ween ourselves from Canadian fossil fuel and build heat pumps for heating? I don't think that's what Trump has in mind.
I can elaborate more. Much of the US natural gas production is in different areas than the customers with no currently operating pipelines to connect. Pipelines can not be "built in a day", unlike Rome; as the old story goes. This takes time and patience, if it's a good idea anyway, in the era of climate change. I assume that climate change can't be waved away by a magic wand either.
I would guess that makes lots of sense as a campus is already used to underground utilities so they should know how to install a system of "Earth to heat pump" technology.
Still it can't be built in one day.
Natural gas burns somewhat cleaner than gasoline that's made from oil. It burns cleaner than coal, but it's still a fossil fuel. Water is it's main "smoke" because it has more "hydrogen" and less "carbon" than other hydrocarbons; like oil.
I do find science interesting.
A poem I just wrote. Things that have been thought of as pipe dreams.
Total US energy disentanglement from Canada, in short order. Can we build pipelines quickly from our natural gas to our own customers?
Another thing called a pipe dream. Mass markets adopting my own minimalist lifestyle.
Yet another thing thought of as a pipe dream. Converting to green energy on short order.
Yes, it all does take patience.
I partially thought up this post because of the pun about pipe dreams and pipe lines.
Another thing called a pipe dream. Mass markets adopting my own minimalist lifestyle.
Yet another thing thought of as a pipe dream. Converting to green energy on short order.
Yes, it all does take patience.
I partially thought up this post because of the pun about pipe dreams and pipe lines.
Like it or not. Adapting to a changing world.
I can think of two aspects of addressing climate change. One aspect is reducing carbon emissions. The other aspect is community resiliency. Thinking about the fires in Los Angeles, resiliency comes to mind. Something similar can be said about Florida and many other localities. As the natural environment is changing the need for things like better fire breaks is needed to protect people's homes from wildfires. This could mean altering the natural environment; such as introducing invasive species that are less flammable than the natural species of plants in an area. This may have to be done if people's residences are, basically invading that same natural area. Modern American homes and the natural environment, in an area, don't mix. Modifying the natural environment, since the residential areas are already nearby, protects the homes from wildfire.
This can be done carefully by thinking about what plants to put in an area to better suite that area for the "American lifestyle and neighborhood planning" that has already invaded the area; for instance single family homes scattered out among a forest or area of naturally flammable brush.
Another idea related to resiliency that is more compatible to not altering the natural environment is to alter our city planning and lifestyles. More compact and denser city planning can be another form of resiliency which creates less sprawl of homes and buildings into formerly natural areas. Less use of the automobile and more alternative transportation can help reduce congestion in denser development. Changes in lifestyles and expectations, to more urban and less consumptive living, can make urban life work and even thrive.
Similar thinking can apply to places like Florida where rising sea levels and storms can mean too much water, rather than too little. Retreating from the coast is one strategy as the ocean starts to reclaim low lying areas.
Making buildings and houses more resilient to fire, flood and wind is also a strategy. These are strategies of resilience given the other strategy of curbing worldwide carbon emissions is slow in coming or could be difficult to achieve. Reducing worldwide carbon emissions is said to be the best strategy of all, however. How is that done?
Similar to community resiliency on the local level, it requires changes in planning, lifestyles and technology. Changing the plant mix in an environment, such as altering things for better firebreaks is a form of change also, though it's less popular with environmentalists. That type of practice, building the fire breaks, removing the flammable forest, for instance may end up being what will be done; especially in the era of Donald Trump. Problem is, Trump is not noted for careful planning. Thinking carefully about how to alter an environment works better than just saying "nuke em and bring in the bulldozers."
Similar situations exist in places like Florida where rising sea levels are likely to change the map of Florida.
A graphic I found on the web. This indicating the potential flooding of Florida. Graphic: Green Policy 360
This can be done carefully by thinking about what plants to put in an area to better suite that area for the "American lifestyle and neighborhood planning" that has already invaded the area; for instance single family homes scattered out among a forest or area of naturally flammable brush.
Another idea related to resiliency that is more compatible to not altering the natural environment is to alter our city planning and lifestyles. More compact and denser city planning can be another form of resiliency which creates less sprawl of homes and buildings into formerly natural areas. Less use of the automobile and more alternative transportation can help reduce congestion in denser development. Changes in lifestyles and expectations, to more urban and less consumptive living, can make urban life work and even thrive.
Similar thinking can apply to places like Florida where rising sea levels and storms can mean too much water, rather than too little. Retreating from the coast is one strategy as the ocean starts to reclaim low lying areas.
Making buildings and houses more resilient to fire, flood and wind is also a strategy. These are strategies of resilience given the other strategy of curbing worldwide carbon emissions is slow in coming or could be difficult to achieve. Reducing worldwide carbon emissions is said to be the best strategy of all, however. How is that done?
Similar to community resiliency on the local level, it requires changes in planning, lifestyles and technology. Changing the plant mix in an environment, such as altering things for better firebreaks is a form of change also, though it's less popular with environmentalists. That type of practice, building the fire breaks, removing the flammable forest, for instance may end up being what will be done; especially in the era of Donald Trump. Problem is, Trump is not noted for careful planning. Thinking carefully about how to alter an environment works better than just saying "nuke em and bring in the bulldozers."
Similar situations exist in places like Florida where rising sea levels are likely to change the map of Florida.
Friday, January 17, 2025
Starting to learn my way around Blue Sky Social Media.
I now have a presence on Blue Sky, but I may end up still liking Facebook more. Blue Sky limits the size of posts so it is more of a realm of sound bytes, rather than in depth discussion.
I plan to link, from Blue Sky, to my blog where there is room for the nuance. Readers may be less apt to follow links than to click the "read more" link in a Facebook post. Still maybe not, it's a link. I think Blue Sky is more like Twitter (now X) only much better and not owned by Elon Musk.
I haven't used Twitter for writing, but I have used it some to follow things like space missions; linking out to NASA and other ongoing news sources.
A link to my presence on Blue Sky Social. It's mostly links back to this blog.
For more things, not already posted on this blog, Facebook users can find my Facebook wall.
I plan to link, from Blue Sky, to my blog where there is room for the nuance. Readers may be less apt to follow links than to click the "read more" link in a Facebook post. Still maybe not, it's a link. I think Blue Sky is more like Twitter (now X) only much better and not owned by Elon Musk.
I haven't used Twitter for writing, but I have used it some to follow things like space missions; linking out to NASA and other ongoing news sources.
A link to my presence on Blue Sky Social. It's mostly links back to this blog.
For more things, not already posted on this blog, Facebook users can find my Facebook wall.
Thursday, January 16, 2025
An idea for reducing conflict between landowners when siting wind turbines.
Here is an idea I thought of today. Financial proceeds from leases for wind turbans could be paid to a special district, rather than individual land owners. Then all the landowners in the district could divvy up the proceeds.
Reason I think of this is I can guess that some of the opposition to wind energy comes from property owners who's land is less desirable for wind energy. Maybe they resent neighbors who's land is more desirable. Financial benefits could be shared with all in the area; even those with no wind farms on their land.
Wind farms do have some impact on the view, wildlife and so forth. I've heard the phrase, "there ain't no free lunch." At the same time, there are things that may need to be done for the greater good; such as energy production.
I've also heard that one turbine in one of the Snake River hydroelectric dams can produce as much power as over 200 wind mills.
Still, I sometimes think of windmills as being like modern art sculptures. As long as we are using energy, there is some price to pay, though wind farms may not be the best alternative. They do dot large portions of the landscape. Solar may be the best alternative energy in many cases.
There is now lots of arguing over the potential siting of another wind farm in the Palouse Region of Washington near where I grew up.
Eastern Washington has many wind turbines. It seems like there are very few in more densely populated Western Washington.
With my interest in geography, I realize that much of Washington State's power comes the eastern part of the state. Big power lines cross the Cascade Mountains.
Much of the power comes from dams on the Columbia and other rivers. Some of the power comes from a nuclear reactor in the Hanford Reservation. Solar is a growing source also. Here in Bellingham, many homes have rooftop solar panels.
My photos from various bicycle tours over the years.
Wind turbine in distance near Ellensburg, WA. Power line near Snoqualmie Tunnel. Generators at Lower Monumental Dam. Palouse wheatfields near Colfax, WA. Solar panels on restaurant in Palouse, WA.
Reason I think of this is I can guess that some of the opposition to wind energy comes from property owners who's land is less desirable for wind energy. Maybe they resent neighbors who's land is more desirable. Financial benefits could be shared with all in the area; even those with no wind farms on their land.
Wind farms do have some impact on the view, wildlife and so forth. I've heard the phrase, "there ain't no free lunch." At the same time, there are things that may need to be done for the greater good; such as energy production.
I've also heard that one turbine in one of the Snake River hydroelectric dams can produce as much power as over 200 wind mills.
Still, I sometimes think of windmills as being like modern art sculptures. As long as we are using energy, there is some price to pay, though wind farms may not be the best alternative. They do dot large portions of the landscape. Solar may be the best alternative energy in many cases.
There is now lots of arguing over the potential siting of another wind farm in the Palouse Region of Washington near where I grew up.
Eastern Washington has many wind turbines. It seems like there are very few in more densely populated Western Washington.
With my interest in geography, I realize that much of Washington State's power comes the eastern part of the state. Big power lines cross the Cascade Mountains.
Much of the power comes from dams on the Columbia and other rivers. Some of the power comes from a nuclear reactor in the Hanford Reservation. Solar is a growing source also. Here in Bellingham, many homes have rooftop solar panels.
My photos from various bicycle tours over the years.
Reconcilling trasgender issues and sports.
I've never been into competitive sports and I'm not that worried about the so called problem of transgender athletes creating unfair competition in women's sports.
I can see how some folks might be worried as we live in an age when the difference between winning and losing a race is measured by laser beams. In the old days, they used to say "measured by a micrometer." In sports, a tiny difference seems trivial to me, but I'm more into fitness and recreation than competition. In science, accuracy is important.
Lasers are a part of the most accurate measurements ever made in history. It's the distance between two mirrors that could be less than 1/1000th of the width of a proton. Those measurements are made at the LIGO Gravity Wave Detectors including one at Hanford.
Below photos from my 2023 summer bicycle and transit trip to LIGO Visitors Center at Hanford, near Richland, WA. from Bellingham, WA.
I can see how some folks might be worried as we live in an age when the difference between winning and losing a race is measured by laser beams. In the old days, they used to say "measured by a micrometer." In sports, a tiny difference seems trivial to me, but I'm more into fitness and recreation than competition. In science, accuracy is important.
Lasers are a part of the most accurate measurements ever made in history. It's the distance between two mirrors that could be less than 1/1000th of the width of a proton. Those measurements are made at the LIGO Gravity Wave Detectors including one at Hanford.
Below photos from my 2023 summer bicycle and transit trip to LIGO Visitors Center at Hanford, near Richland, WA. from Bellingham, WA.
I am now on Blue Sky Social Media as well.
I've been fairly prolific on Facebook which is more interactive than this blog. I plan to keep my Facebook wall, but now opening up a new outlet on Blue Sky. This, in part, due to friends and followers leaving Facebook. They can now find me on Blue Sky.
It's like opening up a new transmitter, if one were in the radio business.
Problem is, Blue Sky limits the size of posts so many of my posts, there, will be links to this blog for more nuance.
I also use Flickr for sharing many photos. Reditt is kind of a learning curve for me, but I use it some. Pretty much my whole online presence is at my website which mostly serves as bookmarks to my archive of things across several platforms.
Scroll down to more of this blog, or visit above link to website.
It's like opening up a new transmitter, if one were in the radio business.
Problem is, Blue Sky limits the size of posts so many of my posts, there, will be links to this blog for more nuance.
I also use Flickr for sharing many photos. Reditt is kind of a learning curve for me, but I use it some. Pretty much my whole online presence is at my website which mostly serves as bookmarks to my archive of things across several platforms.
Scroll down to more of this blog, or visit above link to website.
Be careful not to jump to conclusions when hearing the headlines.
The man behind the incident known as Pizzagate was recently in the news again. On first glance, I was afraid Trump was appointing him to high office.
Turns out he was shot by police during a traffic stop as he was pointing a gun at the police. He died soon after.
This was the man who, in 2016, followed bizarre rumors that began with a leaked email referencing Hillary Clinton and pizza parties. It morphed into fake online news stories about a child sex trafficking ring run by prominent Democrats operating out of a Washington, D.C., pizza joint. Back then he showed up at the pizza parlor armed.
His demise came after a confrontation with police during a traffic stop in 2025.
Many years ago, I was listening to a late night talk show on the old KGO in San Francisco. Some elderly lady called in and was very upset that all the former presidents supported NAMBLA (National Man Boy Love Association). THe talk show host thought she was a kooky caller and hung up.
I realized she had heard a headline about all the former presidents supporting NAFTA (North American Free Trade Act). She thought NAFTA was NAMBLA due to poor radio reception and / or bad hearing.
Turns out he was shot by police during a traffic stop as he was pointing a gun at the police. He died soon after.
This was the man who, in 2016, followed bizarre rumors that began with a leaked email referencing Hillary Clinton and pizza parties. It morphed into fake online news stories about a child sex trafficking ring run by prominent Democrats operating out of a Washington, D.C., pizza joint. Back then he showed up at the pizza parlor armed.
His demise came after a confrontation with police during a traffic stop in 2025.
Many years ago, I was listening to a late night talk show on the old KGO in San Francisco. Some elderly lady called in and was very upset that all the former presidents supported NAMBLA (National Man Boy Love Association). THe talk show host thought she was a kooky caller and hung up.
I realized she had heard a headline about all the former presidents supporting NAFTA (North American Free Trade Act). She thought NAFTA was NAMBLA due to poor radio reception and / or bad hearing.
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Is having gratitude an option only for the privileged? Well, those who are privileged don't have enough gratitude either.
Some people think promoting the concept of gratitude is a bias enjoyed by folks with privilege. Not everyone has lots of things to be thankful for.
Still gratitude is important as even folks with privilege often don't have gratitude either. They are complaining about taxes, crime, their neighborhoods changing and so forth.
Gratitude is also pretty important for folks trying to improve their situations as people, who aren't that happy with their situations, often quarrel among themselves in a sea of complaint. The perfect can be the enemy of the good.
Quarreling often opens the door to "divide and conquer;" a tactic used by folks in power to stay in power.
Still gratitude is important as even folks with privilege often don't have gratitude either. They are complaining about taxes, crime, their neighborhoods changing and so forth.
Gratitude is also pretty important for folks trying to improve their situations as people, who aren't that happy with their situations, often quarrel among themselves in a sea of complaint. The perfect can be the enemy of the good.
Quarreling often opens the door to "divide and conquer;" a tactic used by folks in power to stay in power.
2002's mini 911 that hardly phased a building in Tampa Florida.
Violence and even anger tends to not be a good agent for positive change. In recent news, there have been some acts of individual violence; for instance the cyber truck blowup in front of the Trump Hotel in Las Vegas. This said to be a wake up call, but from a former person said to have favored Trump.
I'm remembering 2002 when a mini 911 happened in Tampa Florida. Someone flew a small plane into an office building causing only light damage to a few offices. Building is still standing, I think, with this memory only a blip in history.
I'm remembering 2002 when a mini 911 happened in Tampa Florida. Someone flew a small plane into an office building causing only light damage to a few offices. Building is still standing, I think, with this memory only a blip in history.
DEI has gotten a bad rap.
DEI stands for diversity equity and inclusion and it's getting lots of push back these days. It's not new. Dating back many decades there have been efforts to improve fairness and inclusion in society. I remember the days when there was sensitivity training and other things under different labels.
My first memories of the DEI acronym was around the time of the angry push back against police in the wake of the killing of George Floyd. I personally did not attend those protests, for several reasons including covid.
It's not that simple, but I guess just change a few buzzwords and strategies to continue efforts toward a more inclusive world.
My first memories of the DEI acronym was around the time of the angry push back against police in the wake of the killing of George Floyd. I personally did not attend those protests, for several reasons including covid.
It's not that simple, but I guess just change a few buzzwords and strategies to continue efforts toward a more inclusive world.
Is the US an oligarchy or a democracy? It's a spectrum.
Some people think USA is already an oligarchy instead of a democracy. Basically run by the rich with their lobbyists, corporate power and so forth. The line between democracy and oligarchy is blurry. It's like a scale depending on where one draws the line, to some extent.
I wouldn't say we are an oligarchy, yet at least. Ironically, populism may be pushing us that way, however. Populism seems to follow celebrities ranging from Donald Trump and Elon Musk to Hollywood celebrities. There are celebrities influencing thinking on both the left and the right. Many conspiracy theories are based on Hollywood movies. I'm not into movies that much, but I remember seeing China Syndrome.
Many callers to radio talk shows seem to get the plots for their conspiracy theories from the movies. They often say, "this is happening like, you know, in the movie (fill in the blank)."
I wouldn't say we are an oligarchy, yet at least. Ironically, populism may be pushing us that way, however. Populism seems to follow celebrities ranging from Donald Trump and Elon Musk to Hollywood celebrities. There are celebrities influencing thinking on both the left and the right. Many conspiracy theories are based on Hollywood movies. I'm not into movies that much, but I remember seeing China Syndrome.
Many callers to radio talk shows seem to get the plots for their conspiracy theories from the movies. They often say, "this is happening like, you know, in the movie (fill in the blank)."
Tuesday, January 14, 2025
Culture needs to evolve before ideals on the left become viable.
I have thought that many of the ideals of us leaning to the left have run counter to consumptive culture. Dependency on cars versus climate change, single family homes versus attempts to curb sprawl, population growth versus the dream of a limited growth economy.
With the fires raging in California, I've read that Governor Newsome has issued an emergency order lifting some of the burdensome environmental red tape, which has been quite a thicket in California. This move to allow for rebuilding of burned areas at a more affordable rate.
Myself, rather than being a radical on "stick it to business" red tape, I understand the need for society to work. At the same time, I am somewhat of a critic of much of our culture ranging from population growth to over dependency on private automobiles to basing one's self esteem on one's wealth and career status.
I think, maybe, the best we can do toward a more sustainable world is incremental changes; a bike path here, transit there, incremental decrease in the size of homes and awareness of what kind of society we should have to be in more harmony with the natural environment.
Bellingham has recently taken a good step to reduce parking requirements for new developments in order to try and allow for more affordable housing. I notice some people, on the left, think this is a sellout to big developers who want to build and reap profits from less requirements. Some people say we have to have cars as it's "reality."
Less regulation, such as less parking requirements can, however, make it easier for mom and pop landlords to incrementally build. This might make it easier for smaller business to compete against the bigger developers who have more money for lawyers to navigate them through tickets of regulation. As for the never ending need for more parking, Bellingham's infrastructure is admittedly getting more cluttered with cars. On street parking is getting fuller, unless people are willing to walk farther from where they have parked than they are use to. This requires a cultural change.
To accommodate more cars, I doubt we will ever be able to afford widening I-5 through Bellingham. We could go to six, or maybe even 8 lanes to try and reduce the chock point. Self driving technology might help us add more cars to the existing 4 lanes, however.
Anyway, without cultural change, it looks like many environmental regulations will need to go.
With the fires raging in California, I've read that Governor Newsome has issued an emergency order lifting some of the burdensome environmental red tape, which has been quite a thicket in California. This move to allow for rebuilding of burned areas at a more affordable rate.
Myself, rather than being a radical on "stick it to business" red tape, I understand the need for society to work. At the same time, I am somewhat of a critic of much of our culture ranging from population growth to over dependency on private automobiles to basing one's self esteem on one's wealth and career status.
I think, maybe, the best we can do toward a more sustainable world is incremental changes; a bike path here, transit there, incremental decrease in the size of homes and awareness of what kind of society we should have to be in more harmony with the natural environment.
Bellingham has recently taken a good step to reduce parking requirements for new developments in order to try and allow for more affordable housing. I notice some people, on the left, think this is a sellout to big developers who want to build and reap profits from less requirements. Some people say we have to have cars as it's "reality."
Less regulation, such as less parking requirements can, however, make it easier for mom and pop landlords to incrementally build. This might make it easier for smaller business to compete against the bigger developers who have more money for lawyers to navigate them through tickets of regulation. As for the never ending need for more parking, Bellingham's infrastructure is admittedly getting more cluttered with cars. On street parking is getting fuller, unless people are willing to walk farther from where they have parked than they are use to. This requires a cultural change.
To accommodate more cars, I doubt we will ever be able to afford widening I-5 through Bellingham. We could go to six, or maybe even 8 lanes to try and reduce the chock point. Self driving technology might help us add more cars to the existing 4 lanes, however.
Anyway, without cultural change, it looks like many environmental regulations will need to go.
Monday, December 30, 2024
Private ownership of business isn't necessarily worse than government, non profits, collectives or condo associations. It's about the people and the quality of stewardship.
I recently saw a video with Bernie Sanders standard augment that a small number of wealthy control the wealth while much of the rest of Americans are barely getting by.
It could be true, but the majority of Americans haven't been voting to change this. Why?
I tend to think there is always going to be ownership of business whether it's government, non profits, worker coops, or private individuals. Someone is going to be taking leadership roles. It might be something owned by many, such as a condo association. I've heard that some condo associations are the "association from hell."
People don't always trust government though government leaders are elected while private owners aren't elected. What's wrong with government?
Worker owned businesses and coops might be better, but they have their issues as well. It depends on who's taking leadership roles? Not everyone is always happy. There is always majority and minority points of view as to how an organization should be run.
It seems like stewardship is more the issue; rather than whether it's private owners or not.
In some cases, private owners reinvest in the business and don't take that much out for personal profit. In other cases the owners milk it for all it's worth, ripping off the employees, customers and communities. Even with non profits there are folks, in leadership, who are bad leaders and even profiting from extravagant salaries. Non profits can be badly managed as well as coops, governments and private corporations.
Stewardship seems to be more the issue.
One wonders why we keep having bad leadership in so many cases. People don't always vote or shop, for that matter, in their best interest.
I tend to think there is always going to be ownership of business whether it's government, non profits, worker coops, or private individuals. Someone is going to be taking leadership roles. It might be something owned by many, such as a condo association. I've heard that some condo associations are the "association from hell."
People don't always trust government though government leaders are elected while private owners aren't elected. What's wrong with government?
Worker owned businesses and coops might be better, but they have their issues as well. It depends on who's taking leadership roles? Not everyone is always happy. There is always majority and minority points of view as to how an organization should be run.
It seems like stewardship is more the issue; rather than whether it's private owners or not.
In some cases, private owners reinvest in the business and don't take that much out for personal profit. In other cases the owners milk it for all it's worth, ripping off the employees, customers and communities. Even with non profits there are folks, in leadership, who are bad leaders and even profiting from extravagant salaries. Non profits can be badly managed as well as coops, governments and private corporations.
Stewardship seems to be more the issue.
One wonders why we keep having bad leadership in so many cases. People don't always vote or shop, for that matter, in their best interest.
Saturday, December 28, 2024
Some of the so called fat in government is good business for Elon Musk.
Elon Musk, the richest person in the world, is taking on the task of reducing government spending. Many folks have said that he could start with his own lucrative contracts from NASA for his Space X company.
Maybe, for all his billions, he could volunteer to pay, out of pocket, for the Space X resupply missions to the International Space Station.
While I am a fan of science, I've been less of a fan of the Space Station. The space station seems to provide less science per dollar spent than other missions; like for instance the Voyager Missions launched clear back in the 1970s and still sending data back from the outer edges of the solar system.
The space station has been going for a long time and costing NASA quite a bit of money. It has some interesting science, such as something called the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer - AMS-02. There is other science onboard including Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER); which I follow somewhat and basically like.
I'm one of the rare breed that follows science more than what billionaire football teams are doing on the football fields. I know more about the stars in the sky than I do about the stars in Hollywood.
I think robotic missions tend to do more interesting science, per dollar spent, than missions with people on board.
Challenges can be useful, however. In it's later years, NASA's need to keep resupplying the space station has provided funding and incentives for companies; like Space X to innovate and fill that need. That has helped to get Space X's systems going so it has now branched out as part of the accelerating private space launch industry.
I use to have more respect for Musk, but his more recent reckless thoughts on X (formerly Twitter) cause me to hear that engineers run his companies and all but ignore the kooky billionaire at the top.
Can he streamline the government? I'm not holding my breath.
Maybe, for all his billions, he could volunteer to pay, out of pocket, for the Space X resupply missions to the International Space Station.
While I am a fan of science, I've been less of a fan of the Space Station. The space station seems to provide less science per dollar spent than other missions; like for instance the Voyager Missions launched clear back in the 1970s and still sending data back from the outer edges of the solar system.
The space station has been going for a long time and costing NASA quite a bit of money. It has some interesting science, such as something called the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer - AMS-02. There is other science onboard including Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER); which I follow somewhat and basically like.
I'm one of the rare breed that follows science more than what billionaire football teams are doing on the football fields. I know more about the stars in the sky than I do about the stars in Hollywood.
I think robotic missions tend to do more interesting science, per dollar spent, than missions with people on board.
Challenges can be useful, however. In it's later years, NASA's need to keep resupplying the space station has provided funding and incentives for companies; like Space X to innovate and fill that need. That has helped to get Space X's systems going so it has now branched out as part of the accelerating private space launch industry.
I use to have more respect for Musk, but his more recent reckless thoughts on X (formerly Twitter) cause me to hear that engineers run his companies and all but ignore the kooky billionaire at the top.
Can he streamline the government? I'm not holding my breath.
Wednesday, December 25, 2024
Taxing McMansions could be a lucrative and overlooked source of revenue for the state of Washington
They are talking about another wealth tax for Washington State, but there is always the worry that the super rich will leave the state and take their money with them, thus reducing available revenue.
How focusing more on taxing big McMansions in the state? There are sure a lot of them. Homes tend to be exempt from these wealth tax proposals, though they do pay some taxes.
Some senior citizens get breaks on property taxes if their ongoing income is below a certain level. They still might own a home worth over a million, but their money is all tied up in the house. This break is unfair to renters who still have to pay indirectly through their rent; if not in subsidized housing. I'm fortunate to be in subsidized housing, but there is a long waiting list to get in.
Maybe the senior citizen homeowner tax break could be treated like a reverse mortgage? One could benefit from the tax break until the house sells, or gets inherited. Then back taxes could be collected.
Maybe there is already something like this in place, but I'll have to research it more. I know that taxing homes is sort of a political no no.
Taxing business is more popular because it's taxing something "other;" rather than taxing people directly.
Ultimately business is just people also. If the owners and executives make huge profits, that can be taxed. It would be taxing the owners and folks making loads of money. Tax their personal wealth and their mansions.
On the other hand, some businesses can be on a thin margin. There may be a high volume of revenue, but it almost all goes back out to expenses. A business may have lots of capital, on paper, but that's the buildings and machinery it uses to do it's business.
Taxing business, especially if it isn't real profitable, falls back on people anyway, in terms of hurting customers, workers and the economy. It can kill the goose that lays the golden egg, so to speak; or at least send the goose flying out of the state.
How focusing more on taxing big McMansions in the state? There are sure a lot of them. Homes tend to be exempt from these wealth tax proposals, though they do pay some taxes.
Some senior citizens get breaks on property taxes if their ongoing income is below a certain level. They still might own a home worth over a million, but their money is all tied up in the house. This break is unfair to renters who still have to pay indirectly through their rent; if not in subsidized housing. I'm fortunate to be in subsidized housing, but there is a long waiting list to get in.
Maybe the senior citizen homeowner tax break could be treated like a reverse mortgage? One could benefit from the tax break until the house sells, or gets inherited. Then back taxes could be collected.
Maybe there is already something like this in place, but I'll have to research it more. I know that taxing homes is sort of a political no no.
Taxing business is more popular because it's taxing something "other;" rather than taxing people directly.
Ultimately business is just people also. If the owners and executives make huge profits, that can be taxed. It would be taxing the owners and folks making loads of money. Tax their personal wealth and their mansions.
On the other hand, some businesses can be on a thin margin. There may be a high volume of revenue, but it almost all goes back out to expenses. A business may have lots of capital, on paper, but that's the buildings and machinery it uses to do it's business.
Taxing business, especially if it isn't real profitable, falls back on people anyway, in terms of hurting customers, workers and the economy. It can kill the goose that lays the golden egg, so to speak; or at least send the goose flying out of the state.
Monday, December 23, 2024
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)